The VA Closed 90,000 Appeals by Mistake. Some Veterans Have to Ask to Get Theirs Back.

Brad Cummings • 6 September 2026

Share this article

A database sweep killed decades of legacy appeals. The settlement reopens them, but most of the class has to speak up first.

Before 2019, keeping a VA appeal alive meant filing a Form 9 after your Statement of the Case. Thousands of veterans did exactly that, on time, and their appeals died anyway, closed automatically by a database that never recorded the filing. No hearing, no warning, in many cases no notice at all. Veterans waited on answers that were never coming.


That's the heart of Freund v. Collins, a class action now covering more than 90,000 veterans and surviving family members, and it's the most consequential thing happening in veterans law right now for anyone who filed an appeal before February 2019.


What went wrong


The VA tracked legacy appeals in a system called VACOLS. When the modern appeals system replaced the old one, the VA ran an automated sweep to close out legacy appeals where no timely Form 9 appeared. The sweep did what it was told. The problem was the data: VACOLS only knew what had been keyed into it, and the VA was slow entering things, so timely appeals looked like missing appeals.


The VA's own Inspector General reviewed the closures and found more than one in six were wrong. Of the flagged files the VA later examined more closely, roughly 70 percent turned out to contain a timely substantive appeal after all.


Two veterans, an Army veteran whose PTSD appeal was closed despite a timely filing and the surviving spouse of another veteran, filed suit in 2021. The Veterans Court dismissed it. The Federal Circuit reversed in 2024. The class was certified in March 2026, and a proposed settlement went to a fairness hearing on August 13, 2026.


What the settlement does, and the part veterans keep missing


Under the proposed terms, the VA audits roughly 28,258 files that most closely match the error pattern, reactivates appeals it confirms were wrongly closed, and processes them as though they had never been closed. Reactivated appeals keep their original effective dates, which is where the money lives: back pay can reach to closures as far back as 1990.


Now the part that will decide whether this settlement actually helps people. Another 64,599 files met most of the search criteria but not all of them, and the VA will only review those on individual request. Nobody audits them automatically. The veteran, or the survivor, has to ask.


That's tens of thousands of families whose relief depends entirely on knowing they can raise their hand. And the class window is wide: appeals closed between December 1990 and February 2025 are potentially in scope.


What to do about it


If you get a letter mentioning Freund, don't ignore it. VA mail is easy to file under "later," and this is the wrong envelope for that.


If you filed a legacy appeal that simply went silent, speak up even without a letter. That's the 64,599 problem in one sentence. Under the proposed settlement, claimants generally have about a year after final court approval to notify the VA that an appeal may have been wrongly closed.


Pull your file and check. Your C-file is where you find out whether a Form 9 went in and what happened after. If your recollection is that you appealed and then heard nothing for years, that's the fact pattern.


If you're a survivor, this includes you. Class membership reaches surviving family members, and reactivated appeals that win pay accrued benefits, which connects directly to what survives a veteran's death.


The bigger pattern


Freund belongs to a run of cases forcing the VA to account for claims that died in silence rather than by decision, alongside the end of implicit denials. The theme is consistent, and so is the lesson: an appeal you never heard back about is not the same as an appeal you lost, and the years between then and now may still be owed to you.


One caution. Until the court issues final approval, the settlement's terms remain proposed. Watch for the court's decision, and treat anyone promising guaranteed Freund outcomes with the same skepticism you'd give any other pitch.


Where we come in


We're a veteran-led firm, and old appeals that vanished are exactly the files we dig into: what you filed, what the VA recorded, and what the original effective date would be worth today. If you appealed before 2019 and never got an answer, reach out and we'll find out what happened to it.

Recent Posts

Person sorting blank cardstock into a brown file organizer on a wooden table.
by Brad Cummings 6 September 2026
An upgrade unlocks benefits but delivers none of them. The corrected DD-214, the VA claims and effective dates, and the benefits veterans forget to chase.
Four people sit talking on a patio around a coffee table in a covered outdoor seating area.
by Brad Cummings 6 September 2026
Leaving everything outright to a second spouse can disinherit your children. The trust structure that protects both, plus the veteran-specific traps.
Person walking in a modern courtyard between tall buildings and glass doors.
by Brad Cummings 6 September 2026
The Supreme Court will decide whether veterans can challenge benefits laws in district court. The case, the stakes, and the incarceration rule behind it.
Person sketching designs in a notebook at a wooden desk by a window, with several drawing pages nearby
by Brad Cummings 6 September 2026
Eleven of fifteen body systems are rewritten; four remain, including sleep apnea and mental disorders. Where the rulemaking stands and what it means now.
Stack of worn books on a curved conveyor belt in a dim industrial room.
by Brad Cummings 29 August 2026
A remand sends your case back for development the VA skipped. Why it happens, how the loop forms, and the compliance argument that breaks it open.
Person organizing stacks of paper at a desk in a sunlit room, with a clock and bookshelf behind.
by Brad Cummings 29 August 2026
How long you've held a rating changes what the VA can do to it. The stabilization rule, the ten-year lock, the twenty-year lock, and what P&T really means.
Woman working on a laptop at a dining table with papers and a mug in a sunlit home office
by Brad Cummings 29 August 2026
The VA proposed shorter applications for claims, DIC, and pension, with new forms due around December. What it fixes, what it can't, and why to file now.
Three people in a counseling session, seated around a desk with a doctor pointing at a scan on a monitor.
by Brad Cummings 29 August 2026
New legislation would permanently expand the VA's precision oncology program. What it would change, plus the rating trap that costs veterans after treatment.
Woman pinning a note on a wall beside a kitchen, holding papers in a sunlit home.
by Brad Cummings 29 August 2026
The VA now pays survivors whichever is greater, DIC or pension, from one claim. What changed, plus the two one-year deadlines tied to nursing home care.
Person video conferencing on a laptop at a desk in a bright home office
by Brad Cummings 22 August 2026
Records review or personal appearance? What discharge board hearings look like now, who benefits from appearing, and how to prepare if you elect one.
Show More